What is truth?

 

 Then they led Jesus from Caiaphas to the Praetorium, and it was early morning.  But they themselves did not go into the Praetorium, and it was early morning.  But they themselves did not go into the Praetorium, lest they should be defiled, but that they might eat the Passover.  

 

Pilate then went out to them and said, "What accusation do you bring against this Man?"  They answered and said to him, "If He were not an evildoer, we would not have delivered Him up to you."  Then Pilate said to them, "You take Him and judge Him according to your law."  Therefore the Jews said to him, "It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death," that the saying of Jesus might be fulfilled which He spoke, signifying by what death He would die.  

 

Then Pilate entered the Praetorium again, called Jesus, and said to Him, "Are You the King of the Jews?"  Jesus answered him, "Are you speaking for yourself about this, or did others tell you this concerning Me?"  Pilate answered, "Am I a Jew?  Your own nation and the chief priests have delivered You to me.  What have You done?"  Jesus answered, "My kingdom is not of this world.  If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now My kingdom is not from here."  Pilate therefore said to Him, "Are You a king them?"  Jesus answered, "You say rightly that I am a king.  For this cause I was born, and for this cause I have come into the world, that I should bear witness to the truth.  Everyone who is of the truth hears My voice."  

 

Pilate said to Him, "What is truth?"  And when he had said this, he went out again to the Jews, and said to them, "I find no fault in Him at all.  But you have a custom that I should release someone to you at the Passover.  Do you therefore want me to release to you the King of the Jews?"  Then they all cried again, saying, "Not this Man, but Barabbas!"  Now Barabbas was a robber.

 

- John 18:28–40

 

Yesterday we read that, following Christ's arrest and His being taken to the home of the high priest for a night trial, Simon Peter followed Jesus, and so did another disciple.  Now that disciple was known to the high priest, and went with Jesus into the courtyard of the high priest.  But Peter stood at the door outside.  Then the other disciple, who was known to the high priest, went out and spoke to her who kept the door, and brought Peter in.  Then the servant girl who kept the door said to Peter, "You are not also one of this Man's disciples, are you?"  He said, "I am not."  Now the servants and officers who had made a fire of coals stood there, for it was cold, and they warmed themselves.  And Peter stood with them and warmed himself.  The high priest then asked Jesus about His disciples and His doctrine.  Jesus answered him, "I spoke openly to the world.  I always taught in synagogues and in the temple, where the Jews always meet, and  in secret I have said nothing.  Why do you ask Me?  Ask those who have heard Me what I said to them.  Indeed they know what I said."  And when He had said these things, one of the officers who stood by struck Jesus with the palm of his hand, saying, "Do You answer the high priest like that?"  Jesus answered him, "If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil; but if well, why do you strike Me?"  Then Annas sent Him bound to Caiaphas the high priest.  Now Simon Peter stood and warmed himself.  Therefore they said to him, "You are not also one of His disciples, are you?"  He denied it and said, "I am not!"  One of the servants of the high priest, a relative of him whose ear Peter cut off, said, "Did I not see you in the garden with Him?"  Peter then denied again; and immediately a rooster crowed. 

 

Then they led Jesus from Caiaphas to the Praetorium, and it was early morning.  But they themselves did not go into the Praetorium, and it was early morning.  But they themselves did not go into the Praetorium, lest they should be defiled, but that they might eat the Passover.    My study Bible cites the commentary of St. John Chrysostom here.  St. Chrysostom notes the irony that Christ's accusers apparently do not fear being defiled by condemning an innocent Man to death -- but at the same time, they would not set foot into a court of justice (they themselves did not go into the Praetorium).   

 

 Pilate then went out to them and said, "What accusation do you bring against this Man?"  They answered and said to him, "If He were not an evildoer, we would not have delivered Him up to you."    Then Pilate said to them, "You take Him and judge Him according to your law."  Therefore the Jews said to him, "It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death," that the saying of Jesus might be fulfilled which He spoke, signifying by what death He would die.  My study Bible comments that since the chief priests of the Jews had no actual crime with which to make an accusation against Jesus, Pilate here refuses to pass judgment.  When the chief priests tell him, "It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death," they are not referring to the Law of Moses.  Instead, they are referring to the laws of Roman occupation, which Pilate knows well, as the Romans reserved the right to execute people.  So, therefore, the chief priests are relying on Pilate to sentence Jesus to death.  Moreover, under Jewish law, stoning was prescribed as the usual means of execution.  But, my study Bible notes, Jesus has prophesied that He would be killed by being lifted up on the Cross (John 3:14; 8:28; 12:32-33), as He had foreknowledge that He would die, not at the hands of the Jews, but by the Roman method of crucifixion.

Then Pilate entered the Praetorium again, called Jesus, and said to Him, "Are You the King of the Jews?"  Jesus answered him, "Are you speaking for yourself about this, or did others tell you this concerning Me?"  Pilate answered, "Am I a Jew?  Your own nation and the chief priests have delivered You to me.  What have You done?"  Jesus answered, "My kingdom is not of this world.  If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now My kingdom is not from here."  Pilate therefore said to Him, "Are You a king them?"  Jesus answered, "You say rightly that I am a king.  For this cause I was born, and for this cause I have come into the world, that I should bear witness to the truth.  Everyone who is of the truth hears My voice."   My study Bible comments that it is unheard of that the accused would have to name the charges against himself in any court, as it is the captors who would be the ones to name the crime.  It says that since Pilate has to ask Jesus what the charges are, it shows that the chief priests could not name any crime He might have committed.  More importantly, this shows that Jesus was the Lord over the events of His death (see John 18:4, 8).  Even the governor has to come to Christ in order for His trial to proceed. 

 

Pilate said to Him, "What is truth?"  And when he had said this, he went out again to the Jews, and said to them, "I find no fault in Him at all.  But you have a custom that I should release someone to you at the Passover.  Do you therefore want me to release to you the King of the Jews?"  Then they all cried again, saying, "Not this Man, but Barabbas!"  Now Barabbas was a robber.   Today's lectionary reading only extends to verse 38, but I have added on the final two verses of the chapter, as they apply to my study Bible's observation.  It says that although Pilate knows Christ to be innocent of any crime, he here attempts to strike a compromise with the Jews by declaring Christ guilty, but freeing Him on account of the Passover.  In this way, the chief priests would get their official declaration of guilt, and at the same time Christ would not be unjustly punished.  

It's interesting to ponder Pilate's question, "What is truth?"  To the religious Jews of the Council, and in particular to the Pharisees, perhaps notions of truth would already have some historical religious or spiritual context or meaning.  But Pilate here is the voice of a world without the religious background of the Jews and Jewish spiritual history.  His question, perhaps, comes in the context of the classical educational understanding of the Roman and Greek world, in particular, one assumes of the philosophers, logicians, mathematicians, and even the poets and playwrights.  The question of Pilate, "What is truth?" is not something that comes out of what we now would call secular society, but in a sense it is related to our modern popular concepts of secularism.   That is, it doesn't come from the religious understanding we know that Jesus encompasses in His fullness.  However, that does not mean that our every day or "secular" notions of truth are absent from Christ's truth.  Christ embraces a deeper and fuller notion of truth, one that includes the Creator of all and things divine and spiritual -- without leaving out our common understanding of the word.  When Pilate asks, "What is truth?" it seems that we might assume the irony here is not lost at all on the original hearers of this Gospel, nor on St. John (the author of the Gospel) at all.  For Pilate's truth embraces this sort of hopeless compromise, that makes no real internal logical sense, but instead makes sense only in terms of expedience.  In that sense, it's not really a true compromise at all, because there is no internal cohesion to the logic of both condemning Christ and setting Him free.  More importantly, the truth is missing from this compromise, for Christ is neither guilty of the charges made against Him (something Pilate knows already), and neither is He embraced by the people as their King, but rather rejected by this crowd stirred up by the religious rulers.  So neither outcome would be, in fact, "true."  Neither is Christ a king in the secular sense of the Gentiles, or in the sense of those who await a Jewish Messiah in imitation of King David.  He fits none of these things in truth.  So while Pilate is coming from an entirely different perspective and cultural understanding, his own notions of truth are incomplete and even self-contradictory, an indication of something that will not stand forever (see Christ's parable of a kingdom divided against itself here).  From the point of view of the Gentile world, and those of us whose ancestors came from the pagan cultures of the Greco-Roman world and its universal influence, we should understand our early Christian forbears as those for whom the greater truth of Christ made such an astounding and transformational impact on the society, and how these great empires were to eventually become Christian.   When we encounter falsehoods cloaked in expedient solutions, half-truths, partial understanding disguised as truth, and all manner of self-contradictory things professed to us as new ideas and concepts, we, also, should remember this greater fullness of truth that so impacted the ancient world.  Even with its tremendous heritage of culture, education, art, poetry, science, and so much more, Christ became the fullness of the truth they had been reaching toward.  Modern facile assumptions that Christian holidays or celebrations simply supplanted ancient ones in order to wield influence are mistaken, particularly in their underestimation of the intelligence of our ancient peoples.   If the solstice had spiritual meaning for the ancients because of the light growing in the world, it would come to have a fuller and deeper meaning in commemorating the Light who is Christ coming into the world.  If the ancients understood truth as central to logic, truth would take on even greater dimensions in the spiritual reality of Christ as the Word or Logos.  If life was to be cherished, it would become something vastly more wealthy and productive in the Holy Spirit, the giver of life.  Greek philosophy was not abandoned, but instead used to create theology and serve the Church.  Architecture and art became even more splendid in the great cathedrals and iconography of the Church.  The literature of classical culture was preserved in monasteries where notions of heroism, of truth, of goodness, and love were deepened and expanded in the nobility and even humility of Christ -- which was offered not to a few elite, but to all of us, even to slaves.  Let us understand Pilate's question, and how it would come to be answered in Christ.  Let us observe how those of the ancient world did not simply reject the good things of their past, but rejoiced in the greater fullness of truth offered in Christ.   They would come to understand that whatever was true, or good, or beautiful served the Person who was truth.  That is, a greater truth of righteousness and grace, which embraced, enhanced, and uplifted what they knew to be true, and good, and beautiful.